An
Era of Transformation: A History of the 1740s-1750s
Kaeleigh
Di Cello
REL-319-01:
18th Century Theology
February
20, 2023
The
years between 1740 and 1760 were an especially unique time in world history. As
cultural enlightenment, technological advancement, and transcontinental war
ensued, it became obvious that the world would never be the same as it once was.
However, along with these secular developments also came spiritual revival. In
fact, the event that perhaps had the most long-term impact on the world between
the years 1740 and 1760 was the Great Awakening. Although
the Great Awakening is considered to have only taken place in the 1740s, its
impact expanded well into the years beyond and can still be felt today.[1] The Great Awakening, no
doubt, was guided by God’s hand, yet it is important to note that it originated
not solely out of spontaneity, but on the heels of major social transformation,
both within the American colonies and across the Atlantic.
By
the time of the Great Awakening, England was the epicenter of trade, both with
the colonies and with the rest of the globe. As trade increased, so did the
need for technological advancement to meet its demands.[2] As a result, industrial
revolution erupted, and population growth and economic development led to
social disruption, especially in the American colonies. Early colonial America
adopted the mercantilist theories that became prevalent in England following
the English Civil War. The most prominent of these theories suggested that an
increase in population directly correlated with an increase in economic
prosperity. This philosophy led colonists to begin seeking population growth in
the New World; knowing the necessity of Great Britain’s help in this matter, the
colonists began promoting, through various means, how beneficial population
growth in the colonies would be, not only to the colonists themselves, but also
to Great Britain.
There
would be three possible groups of people Great Britain could use to meet this
population demand: the poor of England, foreign-born individuals, and African
Slaves.[3] Mercantilist theory
suggested that the importation of uneducated slaves would only lead to slaves’ inability
to assimilate into colonial culture, posing far too many issues, including
slave rebellion, which the colonies were already beginning to experience.[4] As a result, attempts were
initially made to limit slavery in the colonies. One example was Georgia’s
banning slavery in 1735.[5] However, as the importance
of slave labor in the production of staple crops became apparent, English
mercantilist theory had to adopt itself to fit the mold of American agriculture.[6]
The number of slaves imported to the colonies from
1661-1740 steadily increased as the demand for labor went up. However, the
number of imported slaves between the years 1740 and 1750 were only about one
third of the number of slaves that were imported between 1730 and 1740. The
number doubled again between 1750 and 1760 from the previous decade, but the
number of slaves imported within a single decade did not again reach numbers as
high as they were prior to the Great Awakening until the beginning of the
nineteenth century. [7] Therefore, it would seem
that there was some sort of relationship between the spiritual conversion happening
in the colonies and a decrease in the number of slaves imported during the
period of the Great Awakening.
With
the increase in the New World’s population also came an increase in the number
of clergies; in fact, by 1740 there was a total of 420 ministers in New
England, leading to increased tension and debates over various issues,
including clerical authority, and how church should be ordered.[8] As the effects of the Enlightenment
began to take hold in colonial America, especially by means of newly founded
colleges, cultural emphasis began to be placed on contemplation and reasoning.
As ministers faced a congregation of people who were being influenced by these
enlightened ideas, they began dissenting over whether emphasis concerning one’s
relationship with God should be placed on affection or on understanding.[9]
As
the Great Awakening began to take hold, an evangelical antislavery movement arose.
Although Puritans prior to this saw the inconsistency between Christianity and
slavery, the Great Awakening, no doubt, had a great effect in stirring people
to action against the injustice of this institution. As individuals were
experiencing spiritual new birth, the inconsistency between a God who set them
free from sin and the enslavement of their fellow brethren could not be
ignored.
In 1736, John Wesley, influenced by the
Moravians’ strong antislavery sentiments, founded the Savanah society. As a
part of the society’s efforts, he regularly traveled to colonial settlements to
share the gospel not only with white slave owners, but also with the slaves
themselves. Wesley, in turn, influenced George Whitfield, who began traveling
to North America with the belief that it was of the utmost importance for slaves,
who shared the same depraved status as whites, to seek a personal relationship
with God.[10]
As the colonial immigrant
population increased, the native population did the opposite. Tensions arose
between the colonists and the natives as settlement and expansion led to epidemics
in the native communities. Disease killed off much of the native population, and
the natives began raiding the colonies in return.[11] Beginning in 1754,
Britain (which was backed by the colonists) and France (which was backed by the
Native Americans) started arguing over the territory in the Ohio River Basin. Dispute
spilled over into military conflict, eventually leading to the defeat of George
Washington’s forces by the French army. In May of 1756, Britain officially
declared war on France, beginning a seven-year conflict that would have lasting
effects both in Europe, the colonies, and beyone.[12]
Bibliography
A Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century World
History, edited by Jeremy Black and Roy Porter. Oxford, UK: Blackwell
Publishers, 1994.
Anderson,
Fred. The War That Made America. New York, NY: Penguin Group, 2005.
Moffit,
Louis. England on the Eve of the Industrial Revolution. New York, NY:
Barnes and Nobles, Inc., 1964.
Haywood,
Robert C. Mercantilism and
Colonial Slave Labor,
1700-1763. Athens, GA: Southern Historical Association, 1957.
Wood, Betty. "Slavery in Colonial
Georgia." New Georgia Encyclopedia, https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/slavery-in-colonial-georgia/.
Trans-Atlantic
Slave Trade – Database, Trans-Atlantic Slave
Trade - Database (slavevoyages.org).
Stout,
Hary, S.,The
New England Soul: Preaching and Religious Culture in Colonial New England. New
York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1986.
Yoon, Young H., The
Spread of Antislavery Sentiment through Proslavery Tracts in the Transatlantic
Evangelical Community. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
[1] A Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century
World History, ed. Jeremy Black and Roy Porter (Oxford, UK: Blackwell
Publishers, 1994), 300.
[2] Moffit, Louis, England on the
Eve of the Industrial Revolution (New York, NY: Barnes and Noble, Inc.,
1964), xiv.
[3] Haywood, Robert C., Mercantilism and Colonial Slave Labor, 1700-1763 (Athens, GA: Southern
Historical Association, 1957), 457.
[4] Haywood, 459.
[5] Wood, Betty. "Slavery in Colonial
Georgia." New Georgia Encyclopedia, last modified Jul 27, 2021. https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/slavery-in-colonial-georgia/
[6] Haywood, 463.
[7] Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade –
Database, Trans-Atlantic Slave
Trade - Database (slavevoyages.org).
[8] Stout, Hary, S., The New
England Soul: Preaching and Religious Culture in Colonial New England, (New
York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1986), 186-187.
[9] Ibid,172-173.
[10] Yoon, Young H., The spread of
Antislavery Sentiment through Proslavery Tracts in the Transatlantic
Evangelical Community, (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012),
354-355.
[11] Anderson, Fred, The War that
Made America: A Short History of the French and Indian War, (New York, NY:
Penguin Group, 2005), 5.
[12] Black and Porter, 844-846.